On September 9, 2025, Lilly announced TuneLab, giving selected biotech partners access to drug-discovery models trained on proprietary research data that Lilly said cost more than $1 billion to obtain.
That is a meaningful change in access to research capability.
It is also a more precise story than a company giving its data away. Lilly described federated learning that lets partners use the models without directly exposing either party’s proprietary data. Selected partners contribute training data in return for access.
The strategic question it raises for me is how a company can help others build on its expertise while protecting the knowledge that makes the capability useful.
The cost of learning
AI can make parts of research easier to explore: searching material, comparing explanations, identifying questions and preparing for expert conversations. That can widen the set of opportunities a team is able to investigate.
It does not remove the need to check evidence, understand a market or validate a scientific result. Access to a model and proof that a product will work are different milestones.
Revisit the boundaries of your strategy
Some adjacent opportunities were set aside because learning enough to evaluate them looked too expensive. Those decisions are worth revisiting as research tools change.
The useful move is to test whether you can learn enough to make the next decision at a lower cost. Some opportunities will still be outside your capabilities. Others may now be practical to explore.
The same question applies to competitors. What might they now be able to understand about your market that was previously difficult to investigate?
The new strategic metric: initiative velocity
Here's the KPI that should emerge on your exec dashboard:
Initiative velocity: how many new frontiers can your organization meaningfully explore at the same time?
Meaningful meaning: research conducted, experts consulted, feasibility assessed, directional decisions made. Not a dashboard full of zombie pilots. Actual exploration.
Research capacity is one constraint. Management attention, specialist judgment, access to customers and the ability to act on findings are others. A wider exploration program still needs owners and clear decisions.
The compounding advantage
Exploring multiple domains at once doesn't just add, it compounds.
Exploring several domains can reveal connections you would miss by studying each in isolation.
Cross-domain insights generate moves that single-lane competitors can't see. New adjacencies. New customer segments. New business model patterns lifted from industries you weren't previously watching. The value isn't the ten individual explorations. It's the intersections between them.
What comes next
Start with human-directed research: a defined question, a source standard and a decision the findings need to support.
As the workflow becomes repeatable, automate the steps that can be checked reliably. Keep uncertain evidence and consequential decisions visible to the people responsible for the work.
What to do this week.
Revisit the strategic decisions where you rejected a domain because you "didn't have the expertise" or "it would take years to learn."
For each one, ask what evidence would be enough to justify a small next step.
Estimate the research effort again using the tools available now. Talk to the people who know the domain and identify what still needs direct testing. You are looking for a better-informed decision, not a claim to instant expertise.
Keep the question about what your company does well. Add another one alongside it:
How fast can your organization learn something it hasn’t done before?
From the portfolio
Two resources powering this shift inside HauerX companies:
Board of Innovation, AI Transformation Studio redesigning revenue, operations, and AI-native business models for mid-market and Fortune 500.
AlignAI, governance infrastructure to track experiments, research sprints, and new initiatives as your exploration surface expands.
Which domain did you reject because it would "take years to learn"?
Which asset becomes more valuable when the right people can build on it?



